<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/">
<rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.themua.org/collections/items/show/1208">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Screen and Shipwrecks: Bridging the Divide]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:subject><![CDATA[Session 5<br />
UCH in the Makingâ€¦ online session]]></dcterms:subject>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[The use of visual media is an aspect of record keeping and a necessary component of outreach and community engagement in maritime archaeology. Recent technological innovations have created the need to acknowledge multiple available methods of transmitting information to the public. Cross-disciplinary education in screen and archaeology provides students with an innovative means to enhance archaeological knowledge at the tertiary level and the skills to better inform the public through the use of digital media and practice.]]></dcterms:description>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[Helen Carter]]></dcterms:creator>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[ Emily Jateff]]></dcterms:creator>
    <dcterms:date><![CDATA[November 2011]]></dcterms:date>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.themua.org/collections/items/show/1042">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Archaeological Data Recovery Area 2, Fig Island Channel Site, Savannah Harbor, Georgia. Report to Department of the Army the Savannah District Corps of Engineers, Savannah, Georgia from, Panamerican Consultants Inc., Tuscaloosa, Alabama and Gulf Engineers &amp; Consultants Inc., Baton Rouge, Louisiana. 3 of 3. Delivery number 0045.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[, Joe J. Simmons III]]></dcterms:creator>
    <dcterms:date><![CDATA[1995]]></dcterms:date>
    <dcterms:rights><![CDATA[For more information on accessing these publications in Georgia please visit http://georgiashpo.org/archaeology/underwater or send an email to: chris.mccabe@dnr.state.ga.us.]]></dcterms:rights>
    <dcterms:type><![CDATA[Report]]></dcterms:type>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.themua.org/collections/items/show/1288">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[The Seafaring Merchants of Ur]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[A. Leo Oppenheim]]></dcterms:creator>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[Gregory L. Possehl]]></dcterms:creator>
    <dcterms:publisher><![CDATA[Carolina Academic Press]]></dcterms:publisher>
    <dcterms:date><![CDATA[1979]]></dcterms:date>
    <dcterms:type><![CDATA[Book Section]]></dcterms:type>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.themua.org/collections/items/show/1482">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Letters from Mesopotamia: Official, Business, and Private Letters on Clay Tablets from Two Millennia]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[A. Leo Oppenheim]]></dcterms:creator>
    <dcterms:publisher><![CDATA[University Of Chicago Press]]></dcterms:publisher>
    <dcterms:date><![CDATA[1967]]></dcterms:date>
    <dcterms:type><![CDATA[Book]]></dcterms:type>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.themua.org/collections/items/show/1645">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[New Maritime Archaeological discoveries in the Eastern Province of Sri Lanka <br />
with special emphasis on Trincomalee to Pothuwil ]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[The Maritime Archaeology Unit (MAU) of the Central Cultural Fund (CCF) carried out an underwater Archaeological exploration in the Eastern coastal area (From Trincomalee to Potuvill), from the 13th of July to the 26th of August of 2013. Measured and non measured drawings, photographical and video documentation, applying GPS and remote sensing were used for the exploration. Trincomalee, Batticaloa and Pothuwil are the main selected areas for the survey. The MAU team discovered sixteenshipwrecks and 4 other maritime archaeological sites from the survey. Irakkandi wreck at Nilaveli, HMS Diomede wreck at Uppuweli, Trincomalee, SS Lady McCullum wreck, British Sergeant wreck, Pasikuda Iron wreck, Pasikuda Boiler wreck i and ii, Batticaloa Boiler wreck, SS Brennus wreck (Sakkara kappal or jaggery wreck), Kalmunai Boiler wreck at Batticaloa and Akkaraipaththu Boiler wreck, Thirukkovil Boiler wreck, Thirukkovil Iron wreck, Komari Boiler wreck, Omari Boiler wreck at Pothuwil were uncovered during the survey. The underwater archaeological site at Swami rock, Trincomalee, ancient stone bridge at Kayankerni, old Dutch jetty at, Pasikuda and Buddhist underwater archaeology site at Pothuwil were explored and new information unearthed on underwater archaeology. The history of the wrecks goes back to the Dutch (1602- 1794 AD) and British (1798-1948 AD) period of Sri Lanka. Most of the wrecks are steamengine (boiler) wrecks built with iron. A metal anchor and man made stone blocks were found from Swami Rock, and bow sections, stern, propellers and shaft, boilers, and various anchors were found from the wreck sites. Most of the wrecks were found destroyed by treasure hunters.]]></dcterms:description>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[A. M. A. Dayananda]]></dcterms:creator>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[Mahinda Karunarathna, in Van Tilburg, H., Tripati, S., Walker Vadillo, V., Fahy, B., and Kimura, J. (eds.)]]></dcterms:creator>
    <dcterms:date><![CDATA[5/15/2014]]></dcterms:date>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.themua.org/collections/items/show/1389">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Black Boats of Magan: Some Thoughts on Bronze-Age Water Transport in Oman and Beyond from the Impressed Bitumen Slabs of Raâ€™s al-Junayz]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[Cleuziou, Serge]]></dcterms:creator>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[Maurizio Tosi]]></dcterms:creator>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[A. Parpola]]></dcterms:creator>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[P. Koskikallio]]></dcterms:creator>
    <dcterms:publisher><![CDATA[AASF Ser. B 271]]></dcterms:publisher>
    <dcterms:type><![CDATA[Book Section]]></dcterms:type>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.themua.org/collections/items/show/1245">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Reading of the contemporary social consciousness through the shipwreck Earl of Shaftsbury]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:subject><![CDATA[Session 2<br />
Nautical (Ship and boat) Archaeology of South Asia]]></dcterms:subject>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[The shipwreck Earl of Shaftsbury is buried on the southern coast of Sri Lanka very close to a frequented tourist destination. It was run aground hitting on a rock at Akurala about three miles away from the shore. In 1893 when sailing from Bombay to Diamond Island the ship sailed past Rangoon through Colombo harbour after unloading charcoal. It is an iron build four mast sailing vessel. It collided with a reef due to rough waves. Six of the crew drowned and 22 survived. The shipwreck settled at a 50 foot depth. The incident was first reported in the The  Ceylon Examiner Newspaper on 8th, 9th, 10th, and 11th of May 1893. The value of the vessel was estimated at Indian Rupees (Rs.) 300,000 at the time. In one article there is another steamer ship reported wrecked some years previously. This paper includes details of the wreckage as are available from the newspaper reports. What happened after her wreckage was an interesting story. The time was the British colonial period in â€œCeylonâ€ (now Sri Lanka) during which time there was a growing general unrest against the colonial masters. Some information reveals that this mindset may have influenced the rescuers during their rescue efforts of the drowning crew. This paper it is going to elaborate on the story behind the shipwreck of the Earl of Shaftsbury and investigate the social influences towards the wreck site then and now.]]></dcterms:description>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[A.M.A.Dayananda]]></dcterms:creator>
    <dcterms:date><![CDATA[November 2011]]></dcterms:date>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.themua.org/collections/items/show/1270">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Marine Archaeological Investigations on Tamil Nadu Coast, India:  An Overview]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:subject><![CDATA[Session 2<br />
<br />
Nautical (Ship and boat) Archaeology of South Asia]]></dcterms:subject>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Ancient ports such as Kaveripattinam, Nagapattinam, Korkai, Alagankulam, Periyapattinam, all on Tamil Nadu coast have played a dominant role in the transoceanic trade and commerce with many countries since the beginning of the Christian Era (CE, starting from year one on the Georgian Calendar). Many such port towns that existed on the coastal region vanished or were submerged in the sea probably due to coastal erosion, sea level changes and neo-tectonic activity and other causes.<br />
<br />
Poompuhar, a flourishing port town, played a major role in maritime activities in the beginning of the Christian Era. The Sangam literature vividly describes its location, habitation and town planning. The marine archaeological explorations around Poompuhar brought to light the remains of terracotta ring wells, brick structures, and storage jars in the inter-tidal zone. The brick structures, stone structures, and pottery from offshore explorations support the existence of the ancient settlement.<br />
<br />
Mahabalipuram is said to have been a seaport right from the beginning of the Christian Era. Geophysical survey and underwater exploration revealed structural remains including a fallen wall running about 10 metres (m) in length, scattered dressed stone blocks, a few steps leading to a platform and many other structural remains at various locations between 4 and 8 m water depth. The available data confirms that a large area comprising of a building complex have been submerged. These remains could be part of submerged structures and caused by severe coastal erosion in this area. <br />
<br />
The data collected at the above sites support the literary evidence to prove their existence as ports. The major cause for the submergence of these port towns was due to shoreline changes caused by coastal erosion.<br />
]]></dcterms:description>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[Sundaresh]]></dcterms:creator>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[A.S. Gaur]]></dcterms:creator>
    <dcterms:date><![CDATA[November 2011]]></dcterms:date>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.themua.org/collections/items/show/1456">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Qanaâ€™ (Yemen) and the Indian Ocean: The Archaeological Evidence]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[A.V. Sedov]]></dcterms:creator>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[Himanshu Prabha Ray]]></dcterms:creator>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[Jean-Francois Salles]]></dcterms:creator>
    <dcterms:date><![CDATA[1996]]></dcterms:date>
    <dcterms:type><![CDATA[Conference Paper]]></dcterms:type>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.themua.org/collections/items/show/1322">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Shio to kamisama to sono genryuu å¡©ã¨ç¥žæ§˜ã¨ãã®æºæµ]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[å®è³€å¯¿ç”·]]></dcterms:creator>
    <dcterms:date><![CDATA[1997]]></dcterms:date>
    <dcterms:type><![CDATA[Journal Article]]></dcterms:type>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.themua.org/collections/items/show/1281">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Trade Relations between Bahrain and Iraq in the Middle Ages: A Commercial and Political Outline]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[Abdel Jabbar Naji]]></dcterms:creator>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[Abdullah bin Khalid al-Khalifa]]></dcterms:creator>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[Michael Rice]]></dcterms:creator>
    <dcterms:publisher><![CDATA[Kegan Paul]]></dcterms:publisher>
    <dcterms:date><![CDATA[1991]]></dcterms:date>
    <dcterms:type><![CDATA[Book Section]]></dcterms:type>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.themua.org/collections/items/show/1244">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Can tourism exploitation of Underwater Cultural Heritage (UCH) be incompatible with the UNESCO 2001 Convention?]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:subject><![CDATA[Session 12<br />
Some Challenges and Issues in Underwater Cultural Heritage in Southeast Asia]]></dcterms:subject>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Tourism is a major factor of economic growth in many countries especially in developing countries. In 2010, tourism accounted for about 6% of Thailandâ€™s GDP. In a way tourism is commercial exploitation. But is it against Annex Rule 2 of the UNESCO 2001 Convention on Protection of the Underwater Cultural Heritage (2001 Convention)? In the Annex, only active commercial exploitation â€“trading, selling, buying and barteringâ€“ of cultural material is obviously forbidden. Yet, there might be other passive commercial exploitations like tourism which are not stated.<br />
<br />
Can tourism be an alternative source of funds that can be utilised for UCH site protection and management? Because of the countryâ€™s commercial benefits gained from promoting tourism, it can be argued that tourism exploitation is one of the commercial exploitations implied in Annex Rule 2. Additionally, for tourism, the sites have to be opened for public which may cause the tension to in situ preservation and physical protection of sites. Also, it could create direct effects, such as damage to the sites by divers souvenir hunting and treasure hunting, etc.<br />
<br />
On the other hand, tourism can be a successful tool to get people involved and raise awareness which is essential in safeguarding UCH. Furthermore, under Rule 7 of the Annex, it allows knowledge sharing with the public but only when it is not incompatible with the proper protection and management of the sites. In other words, public approach could possibly be applicable only in appropriate ways. However, it does not expressly mention   exploitation through tourism.<br />
<br />
Tourism can bring good fortune to countries as well as many advantages for UCH. Therefore, the prohibition may lead to absurd and even contradictory results. Countries may find it difficult to find financial subsidy and raise pubic awareness for sustainable protection of UCH. Simultaneously, the public is unable to enjoy leisure activities and gain knowledge from the conserved sites.]]></dcterms:description>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[Abhirada Komoot]]></dcterms:creator>
    <dcterms:publisher><![CDATA[November 2011]]></dcterms:publisher>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.themua.org/collections/items/show/1617">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Tracking environmental and historical footprints on Clarence: Comparative XRD analysis of clay-rich sediment samples from a 19th century wreck site in Port Phillip Bay, Victoria, Australia]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Little is known about shipbuilding in Australia in the early to mid 19th century. Under the Australian Research Council (ARC) funded Australian Historic Shipwreck Preservation Project (AHSPP) (www.ahspp.org.au), underwater excavations were carried out in April- May 2012 on the historic trading schooner Clarence, wrecked in shallow waters at Port Phillip Bay, Victoria in September 1850. During excavations, cores collected by lead investigator Peter Veth and principle investigator Vicki Richards were found to contain clay-rich sediment, thought to be ballast. This discovery stimulated investigations of the micro-sedimentary environments and taphonomy associated with the vessel, especially fine-grain sediment supply to the wreck and current and tidal influences on the stability of sediments lodged in and around the site. In order to address these questions, sediment samples were collected from the wreck, seabed and adjacent shorelines. Clay fractions were analysed at the Australian National University (ANU) using X-Ray Diffraction (XRD). Key objectives were to compare mineral signatures in the &#039;ballast&#039; from clay-rich sources on the seabed and coastal foreshores possibly incorporated as the vessel foundered. Results successfully differentiate a) individual samples by seabed location and b) â€œballastâ€ samples in the wreck structure from sampled points around the wreck. The findings suggest that fine sediment within the Clarence shipwreck is likely to be clay ballast, emplaced at some point during the schooner&#039;s working life. The results also inform questions regarding the longer-term conservation of Clarence and similar wrecks located in Australian and Southeast Asian shallow-water settings.]]></dcterms:description>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[Adele Zubrzycka ]]></dcterms:creator>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[Anthony J. Barham]]></dcterms:creator>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[Ulrike Troitzsch, in Van Tilburg, H., Tripati, S., Walker Vadillo, V., Fahy, B., and Kimura, J. (eds.)]]></dcterms:creator>
    <dcterms:date><![CDATA[5/15/2014]]></dcterms:date>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.themua.org/collections/items/show/1230">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[The Belitung Wreck Site After Commercial Salvage In 1998<br />
]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[The Belitung Shipwreck Site, located at 17 meters (m) depth in Belitung waters, Indonesia, is a shipwreck site containing Tang Dynasty (AD 618-906) cargo that was lifted by private salvage companies, Limited Corporation/Perusahaan Terbatas (PT). Sulung Segara Jaya and Seabed Exploration Company in 1998. The salvaging  process was done without involving Indonesian State archaeologists. The shipwreck is an Arab or Indian vessel that includes 60,000  artifacts from the Tang Dynasty. In 2005, the artifacts sold to  Singapore Sentosa Leisure Group. <br />
<br />
In 2010, the Office for Cultural Heritage Preservation of Jambi conducted the first underwater archaeological survey at Belitung Shipwreck site in order to find out the  conditions of the site after the salvaging operation. The result shows that the site is extremely ravaged, with unidentified ceramic fragments spread out in a radius of Â± 20 square meters (mÂ²). It seems clear that the ceramic fragments have been removed by the company then thrown back into the sea because considered non-commercial. Meanwhile, the structure of the actual shipwreck was not found. It was only a big  hole with 6 m wide and 15 m long, which seems to be where the ship may have settled. The remnants are now just a few small wood fragments and a sizable chunk of wood,  this maybe the mast-step. The Belitung Shipwreck is recognized worldwide as an extremely valuable find in Indonesian waters. Preservation efforts are needed to remind future generations that the shipwreck site very important for underwater archaeology in Indonesia. Some preservation efforts that can be done are legal protection, site rehabilitation, and establishing a maritime museum in Belitung Regency. The last of which efforts have initiated two years ago with the aim to preserve artifacts from Belitung shipwreck site and other underwater sites in Bangka Belitung Province.<br />
]]></dcterms:description>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[Agus Sudaryadi]]></dcterms:creator>
    <dcterms:date><![CDATA[November 2011]]></dcterms:date>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.themua.org/collections/items/show/1662">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Video interview with Session 4 chair Akatsuki Takahashi.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[The Pacific Ocean contains a wealth of underwater cultural heritage.  Underwater sites in Oceania span human history from the Stone Age to the Atomic Age. Due to the cultural richness of underwater heritage in the region and its complex history, the protection of these sites is of high importance for the region. Moreover, the potential for sustainable tourism in partnership with diving industry has been attracting a growing attention. <br />
The first UNESCO regional workshop on the Pacific underwater cultural heritage took place in December 2009 in Honiara, Solomon Islands. As possible steps towards building a capacity for managing UCH, participants at the workshop identified the following needs; systematic recording and maintenance of a database of submerged and underwater sites; exploring licensing activities directed at underwater sites; and developing a training and education programme for managers. The papers presented by experts at the workshop were compiled, edited and published as &quot;Underwater Cultural Heritage in Oceania&quot; in 2010. <br />
Based on the recommendations made at the Honiara workshop, a Feasibility Study on <br />
Pacific Capacity Building Programme was prepared by Flinders University with UNESCO support. The Study recommends a possible capacity building programme to be hosted by the University of the South Pacific (USP) in Fiji. The launching of the Pacific Heritage Hub (PHH), a regional facility for knowledge management, capacity building and partnership building, at USP in 2013 presents an opportunity for the actual implementation of the capacity building programme. UNESCO is also exploring the possibility of organising regional and national consultations in the Pacific focusing on cultural policy development. <br />
The objectives of the session are to: <br />
 <br />
â€¢	Enhance understanding of characteristics of UCH in the Pacific. <br />
 <br />
â€¢	Identify priority actions. <br />
 <br />
â€¢	Foster partnership for regional and international cooperation.<br />
]]></dcterms:description>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[Akatsuki Takahashi]]></dcterms:creator>
    <dcterms:date><![CDATA[6/11/2014]]></dcterms:date>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.themua.org/collections/items/show/1575">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[UNESCO Convention on the Protection of the Underwater Cultural Heritage and the Pacific Small Island Developing States (SIDS)]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[This paper will begin by introducing the Convention on the Protection of the Underwater Cultural Heritage adopted by UNESCO in 2001 in terms of background, guiding principles, international cooperation mechanisms, Annex, as well as benefits and implications of ratification by countries. It will provide progress in its implementation at the global level. It will then provide progress in the Pacific Small Islands Developing States (SIDS), addressing their particular challenges and opportunities. The paper will suggest a possible inter-Convention cooperation for the UCH protection and management in the Pacific by analyzing the recent progress in the World Heritage Convention and the Intangible Cultural Heritage Convention in Pacific SIDS. The paper will conclude by summarizing the significance of the Underwater Cultural Heritage (henceforth UCH) protection and the UCH Convention not only in terms of its contribution to the advancement of knowledge of the history of humanity but also from the perspectives of the environmental protection, sustainable development and ocean governance.]]></dcterms:description>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[Akatsuki Takahashi, in Van Tilburg, H., Tripati, S., Walker Vadillo, V., Fahy, B., and Kimura, J. (eds.)]]></dcterms:creator>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.themua.org/collections/items/show/1247">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Deepwater Archaeology off Tobishima Island of Northern Japan]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:subject><![CDATA[Session 3<br />
History and Current Trends of Underwater Archaeology around East Asia]]></dcterms:subject>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Tobishima island on the Japan sea, belonging to Yamagata prefecture, lies about 40 kilometres to the northwest of mainland Japan.  Although the island itself is relatively small, it has been on seaborne trading routes since ancient times.  Trawl fishermen occasionally find earthenware pots of the 8th century by accident around the seabed.  From the late 17th to the 19th centuries Tobishima island was an important islet of call for Kitamaebune, which were wooden cargo ships trading along the northern coast of Japan.  According to local legends, the southeastern waters just in front of the main port is a kind of shipsâ€™ graveyard hallowed by sacred memories.  Contrariwise, no reliable historical record on maritime disasters or shipwrecks exists.  In February 2011 Tokyo University of Marine Science &amp; Technology (TUMSAT) and the Asian Research Institute of Underwater Archaeology (ARIUA) conducted the preliminary submerged survey around these waters, utilising a multibeam sonar system and a Remotely Operated Vehicle (ROV).  The research team succeeded in recording fine-resolution bathymetries and video images of a few shipwrecks lying between 60 and 85 metres.  One looks modern, but one seems to be potentially older.  For the next step, an Autonomous Underwater Vehicle (AUV), which has been designed and developed by TUMSAT, is planned to be employed for the visual mappings.  The AUV is able to hover for observation by approaching very close to specified objects, and is equipped with high definition cameras.<br />
<br />
Two-dimensional and three-dimensional photo mosaics will be obtained, while accurate bathymetry data shall be recorded using sonar and an optical ranging system mounted on the vehicle in order to creat fully-covered and detailed site plans.]]></dcterms:description>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[Hayato Kondo]]></dcterms:creator>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[Akifumi Iwabuchi]]></dcterms:creator>
    <dcterms:date><![CDATA[November 2011]]></dcterms:date>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.themua.org/collections/items/show/1667">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Interview with Session 9 chair Akifumi Iwabuchi.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[East Asia is rich in maritime and underwater cultural heritage. Not only conventional shipwrecks or submerged archaeological sites but also stone tidal weirs or prehistoric shell mounds along coastal zones have extensively been identified by many researchers. Most countries have just started in directing the heritage management in order to preserve them well, but the process of trial and error is still going on. In addition, no Asian nation, except for Cambodia and Iran, has ratified the UNESCOâ€™s 2001 convention yet, partly because of territorial disputes over the sea among several East and Southeast Asian governments. It would be foolish to rule out political considerations when we study maritime or underwater archaeology in Asia. <br />
This session showcases papers about the history and current trends of maritime or underwater archaeology around East Asia. It may includes papers focusing upon historical backgrounds or wakeup calls of underwater cultural studies, ongoing excavations, grass roots movements, legislation efforts, contemporary political matters, and so forth. In 1890 an Ottoman frigate sunk within Japanese territorial waters; her wreck has lately been salvaged by foreign hunters who disregard its domestic law for the protection  of cultural properties, while Japanese academic institutions or underwater archaeological organizations have been kept away from the excavation activities.  Papers on points raised from such case studies will also be welcomed. <br />
]]></dcterms:description>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[Akifumi Iwabuchi and Tatsuya Nakada<br />
]]></dcterms:creator>
    <dcterms:date><![CDATA[6/11/2014]]></dcterms:date>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.themua.org/collections/items/show/1623">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Stone Tidal Weirs, Underwater Cultural Heritage or Not?]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[The stone tidal weir is a kind of fish trap, made of numerous rocks or reef limestones, which extends along the shoreline on a colossal scale in semicircular, half-quadrilateral, or almost linear shape. At the flood tide these weirs are submerged beneath the sea, while they emerge into full view at the ebb. Using with nets or tridents, fishermen, inside the weirs at low tides, catch fish that fails to escape because of the stone walls.  They could be observed in the Pacific or the Yap Islands, in the Indian Ocean or the east African coast, and in the Atlantic or Oleron and RÃ© Islands. The UNESCOâ€™s 2001 Convention regards this weir as underwater cultural heritage, because it has been partially or totally under water, periodically or continuously, for at least 100 years; stone tidal weirs have been built in France since the 11th century and a historical record notes that one weir in the Ryukyu Islands was built in the 17th century.  In Japan every weir is considered not to be buried cultural property or cultural heritage investigated by archaeologists, but to be folk cultural asset studied by anthropologists, according to its domestic law for the protection of cultural properties.  Even now in many countries stone tidal weirs are continuously built or restored by locals. Owing to the contemporary trait, it is not easy to preserve them under the name of underwater cultural heritage. Sometimes their bases were constructed several hundred years ago while their upper parts were repaired very recently.]]></dcterms:description>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[Akifumi Iwabuchi, in Van Tilburg, H., Tripati, S., Walker Vadillo, V., Fahy, B., and Kimura, J. (eds.)]]></dcterms:creator>
    <dcterms:date><![CDATA[5/15/2014]]></dcterms:date>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.themua.org/collections/items/show/1398">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Account of India and China. In Arabic Classical Accounts of India and China]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[al=Tajir Sulayman]]></dcterms:creator>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[S. Maqbul Ahmad]]></dcterms:creator>
    <dcterms:publisher><![CDATA[Indian Institute of Advanced Study in association with Rddhi-India, Calcutta]]></dcterms:publisher>
    <dcterms:date><![CDATA[1989]]></dcterms:date>
    <dcterms:type><![CDATA[Book]]></dcterms:type>
</rdf:Description></rdf:RDF>
