<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/">
<rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.themua.org/collections/items/show/1674">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Re-examining the Butuan Boats Pre-colonial Philippine Watercraft]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:subject><![CDATA[Poster Session ]]></dcterms:subject>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Poster presented at the 2014 Asia-Pacific Regional Conference on Underwater Cultural Heritage]]></dcterms:description>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[Ligaya Lacsina]]></dcterms:creator>
    <dcterms:date><![CDATA[7/9/2014]]></dcterms:date>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.themua.org/collections/items/show/1673">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Video interview with Session 15 chair Craig Forrest.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[The legal framework for the protection of the underwater cultural heritage has gained momentum throughout the Asia-Pacific with a number of States turning their attention to this issue. For some this is due to concerns raised though specific incidents that have damaged or destroyed the underwater cultural heritage or the information that could be gleaned from its excavation, whilst for others, it follows from consideration being given to the UNESCO Convention on the Protection of the Underwater Cultural Heritage. <br />
This session considers the Legal Framework for the Protection of the Underwater Cultural Heritage in a number of Asia-Pacific states. The objectives of session are to explore the various national approaches and to seek aspects of commonality and uniformity that provide frameworks for other state that have not yet addressed the issue. <br />
]]></dcterms:description>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[Craig Forrest ]]></dcterms:creator>
    <dcterms:date><![CDATA[6/12/2014]]></dcterms:date>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.themua.org/collections/items/show/1672">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Video interview with Session 14 Chair Carlos Ausejo.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Navigation was not unknown in the Americas, at the Spaniards arrival different kind of vessel were in use both in the Pacific and the Atlantic shores, as well as in lakes or rivers. Canoe, reed rafts, balsa log raft and others skin based watercraft have been described mainly on historical records and gave us an idea of this technologies. Although it is clear that long and short distance maritime trade routes were in use and watercraft were also involve in war activities and other maritime activities, archaeological evidence related with actual boats has been elusive to find. Still some of these traditions have survived time and in use with some changes and others were incorporated to European navigation traditions. <br />
During the last decades an increasing interest among researchers in addition to new and different approaches from a broad spectrum of perspectives, including archaeology, history, ethnohistory and ethnography, has brought new and better understanding about these technologies. In spite of this, venues of dialogue to present and discuss about these traditions has been practically inexistent <br />
The aim of this session is to show research advances on this topic mainly in the Pacific shores and inland waters through different perspectives up to the Spanish arrival. It will focus primarily in the Andean and Mesoamerican region, however other regions would be accepted. <br />
]]></dcterms:description>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[Carlos Ausejo]]></dcterms:creator>
    <dcterms:date><![CDATA[6/12/2014]]></dcterms:date>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.themua.org/collections/items/show/1671">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Video interview with Session 13 chair Sila Tripati.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Maritime archaeology, a new branch of social sciences, took its birth in the Mediterranean Sea in the 19th century and academically it began after 1950. Maritime archaeology is also known as â€˜underwaterâ€™, â€˜marineâ€™ and â€˜nauticalâ€™ archaeology. All are valid terms for different aspects. One aspect of Underwater Archaeology is the study of the past through submerged remains such as shipwrecks, habitations and ports. <br />
Maritime Archaeology, while being similar to â€˜Underwater Archaeologyâ€™, goes beyond waterscape, because it includes all related disciplines covering maritime and nautical archaeology. In the recent past, the new nomenclature â€˜Hydro-archaeologyâ€™ has been coined to include all aspects of maritime archaeology where water plays a great role. Taking into consideration the importance of maritime archaeology, many universities, research institutes and professional societies have introduced maritime archaeology in their regular curriculum and are carrying out explorations and excavations and offer training to researchers, students and amateurs. Maritime archaeological studies have been carried out all over the world, except a few countries, either by the respective states or by state sponsored or private or international organisations. <br />
Taking into account the relevance and wider prospective of maritime archaeology, papers dealing with recent researches on maritime and underwater archaeology and allied disciplines are considered in this session. Studies on shipwrecks, sources on maritime archaeological studies, ports and trade routes, traditional boatbuilding technology, anchors are welcome. <br />
]]></dcterms:description>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[Sila Tripati]]></dcterms:creator>
    <dcterms:date><![CDATA[6/12/2014]]></dcterms:date>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.themua.org/collections/items/show/1670">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Video interview with Session 12 chair Nia Hasanah ]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[The richness of underwater cultural heritage (UCH) in the Southeast Asian region has been very well known throughout the world. Various shipping activities, trade, warfare, piracy occur in Southeast Asian waters since prehistoric times to the present, causing many archaeological relics in the bottom of the sea in that region, such as shipwrecks which are a traditional ships owned by countries in Southeast Asia and also foreign ships from various countries in the world which sank due to various causes in Southeast Asian Waters. UCH in Southeast Asia has become a very important resource for science, history and even for economic interests relating to the welfare of the local communities which in some areas, UCH shipwreck sites serve as diving attractions. <br />
UCH in Southeast Asia have also attracted treasure hunters both the international big companies and national companies in Southeast Asian countries. In many areas, in particularly in small islands and coastal areas with low level economic life, the locals often plunder the UCH sites, raise up the cargoes, and also take the ship parts mainly made of metal materials to be sold for sustaining their lives. Treasure hunt problem; looting by local people; the lack of human resources, facilities, and funds for research, monitoring, and conservation; as well as the lack of understanding and awareness of the central government, local government, civil society, and local communities make the problems associated UCH in Southeast Asia being very complex. <br />
The UCH richness and the complexity of the problems associated with it in Southeast Asia make this being one of critical theme to be highlighted in this conference. There is a need to share a current information betweeen the countries to strengthen the bond and to foster the regional and international cooperation. <br />
This session will discuss: <br />
 <br />
â€¢	Current issues, problems, and challenges faced by Southeast Asian countries in efforts to study, to protect, and to preserve the UCH. <br />
â€¢	The threats faced by UCH i.e. the human factors, climate change, and changes in the physical environment in the waters of Southeast Asian countries. <br />
â€¢	The results of resent research conducted in the field of UCH in Southeast Asian countries. <br />
â€¢	Protection and conservation measures in accordance with the UNESCO Convention 2001 which can be applied in Southeast Asian countries. <br />
]]></dcterms:description>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[Nia Hasanah ]]></dcterms:creator>
    <dcterms:date><![CDATA[6/12/2014]]></dcterms:date>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.themua.org/collections/items/show/1669">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Video interview with Session 11 chair Bill Jeffery.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Underwater Cultural Heritage (UCH) from World War II is extensive throughout the Asia/Pacific Region. It encompasses numerous warships from many Nations, thousands of merchant ships commissioned to support the war effort, and also many other types of sites and objects such as aircraft, docks, lighthouses. A database of World War II shipwrecks for the Asia/Pacific Region stands at around 3,800 and many of them have not been explored. In 2014, World War Iâ€™s underwater cultural heritage will begin to fall under the full scope of the 2001 UNESCO Convention on the Protection of the Underwater Cultural Heritage, and although it will be several more years for World War II sites to fulfill the Conventionâ€™s 100 year-old provision, sections  of the Convention such as the Annex are now applicable in their management. <br />
The UCH relating to WW II has a great historical importance. It is a reminder of the existence of the war and its horrible consequences. The majority of the UCH lying on the seabed are also grave sites still containing human remains. One of the goals of preservation and research must therefore be to make the public understand their historic significance and to raise the public awareness of the historical testimony these remains constitute. Many World War II sites are also popular diving sites, lending themselves to cultural tourism, and through effective in situ management and interpretation, they are significant sites in conveying many stories and reaching many people. <br />
The UCH of WW II are an important historical source of information. They can represent the peak of technology at that time. They can also contain multi-vocal valuesâ€”different groups of people perceiving and valuing them differentlyâ€”particularly in regard to local indigenous communities who were innocent bystanders in the war but their world, their culture and heritage changed forever. The management of UCH relating to World War II contributes to the efforts in undertaking research reminding present and future generations of the importance of peace. <br />
The objectives of the session are to: <br />
 <br />
â€¢	Advance knowledge of related UCH in the Pacific, <br />
 <br />
â€¢	Identify priority actions in terms of research, preservation and education, <br />
â€¢	Foster partnership for regional and international cooperation.<br />
]]></dcterms:description>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[Bill Jeffery ]]></dcterms:creator>
    <dcterms:date><![CDATA[6/12/2014]]></dcterms:date>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.themua.org/collections/items/show/1668">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Video interviews with Session 10 chair Kehau Watson and panel participants William J Aila Jr. and Kepa Maly.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Responding to the effort to protect both natural and cultural resources within the marine environment for the benefit of present and future generations, state and federal resource management agencies have been re-examining their cultural resource preservation mandates. New understanding of cultural heritage, marine cultural resources, tribes, indigenous peoples, and cultural landscapes is beginning to emerge. It is clear that â€œall traces of human existence that lie under water and have a cultural or historical characterâ€ (UCH) includes much more than simply shipwrecks and aircraft. The potential for these new definitions to engage local communities and associated disciplines and to address biocultural conservation needs is great, particularly for indigenous communities in Hawaii and the Pacific who are currently undertaking extraordinary efforts to plan for and protect their resources from climate change and other environmental threats. By integrating indigenous cultural landscapes and their related biocultural resources into a dynamic paradigm on underwater cultural heritage, the field looks to gain allies across stakeholder groups and develop its relevancy for younger generations, thus helping to ensure long-range traction for the preservation of all underwater heritage resources. Participants in this session will focus  on  policy  and  research  issues  in  indigenous  cultural  landscapes,  and  the dynamic nature of cultural heritage management in Hawaiâ€˜i and across the Pacific. ]]></dcterms:description>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[Kehau Watson ]]></dcterms:creator>
    <dcterms:date><![CDATA[6/11/2014]]></dcterms:date>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.themua.org/collections/items/show/1667">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Interview with Session 9 chair Akifumi Iwabuchi.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[East Asia is rich in maritime and underwater cultural heritage. Not only conventional shipwrecks or submerged archaeological sites but also stone tidal weirs or prehistoric shell mounds along coastal zones have extensively been identified by many researchers. Most countries have just started in directing the heritage management in order to preserve them well, but the process of trial and error is still going on. In addition, no Asian nation, except for Cambodia and Iran, has ratified the UNESCOâ€™s 2001 convention yet, partly because of territorial disputes over the sea among several East and Southeast Asian governments. It would be foolish to rule out political considerations when we study maritime or underwater archaeology in Asia. <br />
This session showcases papers about the history and current trends of maritime or underwater archaeology around East Asia. It may includes papers focusing upon historical backgrounds or wakeup calls of underwater cultural studies, ongoing excavations, grass roots movements, legislation efforts, contemporary political matters, and so forth. In 1890 an Ottoman frigate sunk within Japanese territorial waters; her wreck has lately been salvaged by foreign hunters who disregard its domestic law for the protection  of cultural properties, while Japanese academic institutions or underwater archaeological organizations have been kept away from the excavation activities.  Papers on points raised from such case studies will also be welcomed. <br />
]]></dcterms:description>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[Akifumi Iwabuchi and Tatsuya Nakada<br />
]]></dcterms:creator>
    <dcterms:date><![CDATA[6/11/2014]]></dcterms:date>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.themua.org/collections/items/show/1666">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Video interview with Session 8 chair Atthasit Sukkham.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Trade ceramics have usually been found together with other evidence in many ancient shipwrecks, harbours, ports, trade centers, hinterlands and burials around the world which were linked to international maritime trade routes. These were specifically Chinese, Indian, Southeast Asian, Middle East and European trade routes over a long period of history. Trade ceramics are virtually indestructible. They are also one of the most important sources of information for maritime archaeological studies concerning the dating of ceramics and shipwrecks, origins of ceramics, points of departure and destinations of ships and shipments, for instance. This session aims to provide an opportunity for specialists to contribute their knowledge on trade ceramics in multi-disciplinary approaches and foster international collaboration for ceramic studies from the shipwrecks, harbours, ports and related archaeological sites in near future. ]]></dcterms:description>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[Atthasit Sukkham, Sharon Wong Wai Yee,  and Ngo The Bach<br />
]]></dcterms:creator>
    <dcterms:date><![CDATA[6/11/2014]]></dcterms:date>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.themua.org/collections/items/show/1665">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Video interview with Session 7 chair Vicki Richards and Jon Carpenter.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[This session will focus on in-situ preservation and conservation management issues, conservation analyses and treatments, and applied conservation research of archaeological materials from freshwater, marine and wet terrestrial sites. The main purposes of this session are to encourage the exchange of ideas and practices as well as the development of conservation networks throughout the region. Presentations, posters and workshops are invited that address any of the following areas: <br />
â€¢	In situ preservation of marine archaeological materials, including reburial practices <br />
 â€¢	Conservation management of shipwreck sites, including on-site monitoring <br />
 â€¢	Conservation treatment case studies <br />
 â€¢	Research into the analysis and treatment of wet archaeological materials <br />
 â€¢	Review of the status of wet archaeological conservation programs in the Asia Pacific <br />
region <br />
â€¢	Development of collaborative conservation research and treatment programs Suggestions for additional topics are welcomed by the session organizers. <br />
]]></dcterms:description>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[Ian Godfrey, Vicki Richards, and Debra Shefi ]]></dcterms:creator>
    <dcterms:date><![CDATA[6/11/2014]]></dcterms:date>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.themua.org/collections/items/show/1664">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Interview with Session 6 co-chair Veronica Walker Vadillo.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[The arrival of Spain and Portugal in Asia-Pacific in the 1500s marked a turning point in the history of the region. New foreign actors came into play: priests, merchants and mercenaries looking to save souls and profit from trade in exotic Asian goods. Far from their Iberian homeland, their deeds and actions, violent or not, resulted in a myriad of interactions that altered the life of the people who lived around their areas of influence, including that of the newcomers. This flow of people and goods circumnavigated the world by well established maritime routes. In 1565, the Spanish established the Manila galleon trade route, which linked Asia with the Americas, and from there to Europe. From the early 1500s, the Portuguese dominated the route that linked Asia with Africa, Brazil and Europe in what is known as the Roteiro. The most visible archaeological evidence of these trade routes is the ships in which the goods were transported around the globe, and also the interaction with different cultures that were located in trading posts along these routes. But through contact also came knowledge exchange and other subtle changes including the migration of people, flora, and fauna. In this session we want to discuss archaeological, historical, and ethnographic evidence that remains of this global enterprise that connected Europe to Asia through maritime trade, and all the entrepÃ´ts that stood along the way. ]]></dcterms:description>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[Veronica Walker Vadillo and Brian Fahy]]></dcterms:creator>
    <dcterms:date><![CDATA[6/11/2014]]></dcterms:date>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.themua.org/collections/items/show/1663">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Video interview with Session 5 chair MarÃ­a Cruz Berrocal.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Research on early modern colonialism in the Asia-Pacific region makes a fundamental contribution to the study of Global History. In the last decades, historians are highlighting the region&#039;s relevance in the transformation of global economy through its role in far-reaching trade networks. The early beginnings of colonialism in the region, as well as the role of non-Angloamerican colonial agents in the shaping of modern world have been also highlighted. <br />
Although these debates have been driven largely from history, archaeology must become more prominent for the study of early modern colonialism in the Asia-Pacific region through the study of consumption patterns, environmental effects, demographic impacts, transformation of gender systems brought about by contact, the role of material culture in these first colonial endeavours, and specifically, the important evidence that maritime archaeology can bring to the fore. It is argued in this session that new lines of evidence and argumentation will be found through a history- archaeology joint collaboration. <br />
]]></dcterms:description>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[MarÃ­a Cruz Berrocal and Mark Staniforth]]></dcterms:creator>
    <dcterms:date><![CDATA[6/11/2014]]></dcterms:date>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.themua.org/collections/items/show/1662">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Video interview with Session 4 chair Akatsuki Takahashi.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[The Pacific Ocean contains a wealth of underwater cultural heritage.  Underwater sites in Oceania span human history from the Stone Age to the Atomic Age. Due to the cultural richness of underwater heritage in the region and its complex history, the protection of these sites is of high importance for the region. Moreover, the potential for sustainable tourism in partnership with diving industry has been attracting a growing attention. <br />
The first UNESCO regional workshop on the Pacific underwater cultural heritage took place in December 2009 in Honiara, Solomon Islands. As possible steps towards building a capacity for managing UCH, participants at the workshop identified the following needs; systematic recording and maintenance of a database of submerged and underwater sites; exploring licensing activities directed at underwater sites; and developing a training and education programme for managers. The papers presented by experts at the workshop were compiled, edited and published as &quot;Underwater Cultural Heritage in Oceania&quot; in 2010. <br />
Based on the recommendations made at the Honiara workshop, a Feasibility Study on <br />
Pacific Capacity Building Programme was prepared by Flinders University with UNESCO support. The Study recommends a possible capacity building programme to be hosted by the University of the South Pacific (USP) in Fiji. The launching of the Pacific Heritage Hub (PHH), a regional facility for knowledge management, capacity building and partnership building, at USP in 2013 presents an opportunity for the actual implementation of the capacity building programme. UNESCO is also exploring the possibility of organising regional and national consultations in the Pacific focusing on cultural policy development. <br />
The objectives of the session are to: <br />
 <br />
â€¢	Enhance understanding of characteristics of UCH in the Pacific. <br />
 <br />
â€¢	Identify priority actions. <br />
 <br />
â€¢	Foster partnership for regional and international cooperation.<br />
]]></dcterms:description>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[Akatsuki Takahashi]]></dcterms:creator>
    <dcterms:date><![CDATA[6/11/2014]]></dcterms:date>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.themua.org/collections/items/show/1661">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Video Interview with Dr. Bill Jeffery on Sessions 3 and 11. <br /><br /><br />]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Underwater cultural heritage holds a vast potential for sustainable development. It is a very interesting and attractive form of heritage, appreciated by the public. Underwater cultural heritage opens tourism opportunities. Worldwide, national authorities create dive trails to foster diving tourism economies. This is of special importance for States bordering the ocean, in particular Small Island Developing States (SIDS), which can greatly enhance their tourist attractiveness through the valorization of submerged archaeological sites. The investment in museums on underwater archaeology, dive trails and other forms of access for the public promise a beneficial and lasting return. Studies show that every USD invested in heritage increases the economic activity around the site by a factor between 1.2 to 8, depending on the significance of the site and the form of its valorization by museums and individual access. This is in particular to be noted as raise in employment and gain (hotels, food sales, transport benefit, guides), raise of cultural and educational levels in a region and improved consideration of heritage and local pride. Concerned forms of tourism in the case of underwater cultural heritage are cultural, dive and cruise tourism. New approaches and valid alternatives to commercial exploitation of sites are under consideration in order to finance underwater archaeological research and sustainable management of underwater cultural heritage sites, which include; i) dive club guardianship sites, ii) paid and controlled public visits of archaeological work, iii) evaluation of cultural development needs, iv) tour and exhibition opportunities, v) film and book rights in planning archaeological excavations. The objectives of the session are to: <br />â€¢ Enhance understanding of the contribution of underwater cultural heritage to sustainable development; â€¢ Identify and promote good practice; <br />â€¢ Foster partnership for regional and international cooperation. <br /><br /><br /><em>Editorâ€™s note: </em><br /><br /><em>Although Dr. Jeffery refers to Session 2 in his interview that session was later changed to Session 3.</em>]]></dcterms:description>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[Meretui Ratunabuabua]]></dcterms:creator>
    <dcterms:date><![CDATA[6/11/2014]]></dcterms:date>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.themua.org/collections/items/show/1660">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Video Interview with keynote speaker Dr. James P. Delgado]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[Michelle Damian]]></dcterms:creator>
    <dcterms:publisher><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.themua.org">The Museum of Underwater Archaeology</a>]]></dcterms:publisher>
    <dcterms:date><![CDATA[6/11/2014]]></dcterms:date>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.themua.org/collections/items/show/1659">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Video interview with Session 2 chair Hans Van Tilburg.<br />
]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:subject><![CDATA[<br /><br />]]></dcterms:subject>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[In 2009, responding to the effort to protect the significant natural and cultural resources within the marine environment for the benefit of present and future generations, the U.S. National Marine Protected Areas Center formed a Cultural Heritage Resources Working Group to provide expert advice on improving the conservation and management of maritime heritage resources. The resulting White Paper provided a series of recommendations to both the U.S. Department of Commerce and the Department of the Interior, including new definitions for cultural heritage, marine cultural resources, tribes, indigenous peoples, and cultural landscapes. Central to these recommendations was a strong endorsement for the Cultural Landscape Approach in the understanding and management of maritime heritage resources (or UCH). Subsequently, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administrationâ€™s (NOAA) Maritime Heritage Program has adopted the recommendations of this paper and is implementing a â€œmaritime cultural landscapeâ€ approach to the management of cultural resources within the National Marine Sanctuary System. Also as a part of this initiative, NOAA and the Bureau of Ocean Energy and Management (BOEM) have teamed up to support maritime cultural landscape studies of heritage resources by Native American Tribes and Native Hawaiian communities in the Pacific region. These projects on the U.S. West Coast and in the Hawaiian Islands demonstrate the necessity of adapting a broader range of recognized cultural resources and a more inclusive and participatory management and preservation process. Charismatic resources like historic shipwrecks will always provide unique information for archaeologists and historians, but we do ourselves a disservice if we focus solely on these types of properties, and neglect other perspectives and the broader nature of all types and traces of human existence that lie underwater.<br />
Participants in this session will focus on the status of these ongoing ground-breaking projects, the advantages of a broader and more inclusive approach compared to the previous cultural heritage management paradigm in the U.S., and the challenges that this creates.<br />
]]></dcterms:description>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[Hans Van Tilburg]]></dcterms:creator>
    <dcterms:date><![CDATA[6/9/2014]]></dcterms:date>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.themua.org/collections/items/show/1658">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[A Chinese Perspective on the International Legal Scheme for the Protection of Underwater Cultural Heritage]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[With 18,000 km of coastline and plentiful streams and rivers, China has an extensive underwater cultural heritage (UCH), which preserves Chinese history and maritime civilization under the ocean as a kind of â€œtime capsuleâ€. After 20-years of development of underwater archaeology and the protection of UCH, China has set up a brand-new national protection system. This contribution first discusses the new development of the Chinese UCH legal system in the 21th century in three aspects: legal subject, legal object and legal content. Further it discussed the tremendous challenges faced by the Chinese legal system. Meanwhile, since its entry into force in 2009, the UNESCO Convention on the Protection of the Underwater Cultural Heritage (UNESCO 2001 Convention) has been gradually approved by more and more influential States who hold various and abundant UCH items. Part two explains the UNESCO 2001 Convention as the International Cooperation Scheme for Protection of UCH. Part three examines, from the Chinese perspective, the advantages and obstacles for a State that ratifies the UNESCO 2001 Convention. There is a final conclusion that argues that through the UNESCO 2001 Convention diverse national legal protection systems of the UCH have converged into an international cooperation legal instrument.]]></dcterms:description>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[Liu Lina, in Van Tilburg, H., Tripati, S., Walker Vadillo, V., Fahy, B., and Kimura, J. (eds.)]]></dcterms:creator>
    <dcterms:date><![CDATA[5/20/2014]]></dcterms:date>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.themua.org/collections/items/show/1657">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[New approach to protect the underwater cultural heritage in Sri Lanka]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[In 2001 the Minister of Fisheries and Aquatic Resources Development passed a bill in the Parliament of Sri Lanka entitled the â€œLongâ€“Term Management of Maritime Wrecks and Underwater Cultural Heritage of Sri Lankaâ€.. A committee, known as the Inter Ministerial Committee chaired by the Secretary of the Ministry of Fisheries, was formed to give effect to the bill. Four general meetings have been held and many important decisions have been taken, including stopping salvage and destroying wrecks. This is a very important step towards protecting of the UCH in Sri Lanka. Apart from this, the draft amendment for the Antiquity Ordinance no 9, 1940; brought into effect in 2012, provides that any vessels that had run aground more than one hundred years ago, or built more than one hundred years ago, shall be considered underwater cultural heritage. An amendment brought in 1998 for the same ordinance had extended the meaning by adding â€œfound in the Sri Lankan watersâ€, bringing greater protection for UCH in Sri Lanka. The Sri Lankan Navy is assisting by giving coverage for protection as a whole and it was strengthened with the request of the Director General of Archaeology for stopping any attempt to destroy UCH in our waters. A newly formed department for protecting coastal zones is well educated for the prevention of any harmful activity on UCH. There are several other rules and regulations related to the protection of UCH in Sri Lanka, which will be covered in this paper.]]></dcterms:description>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[Sanath Karunarathna, in Van Tilburg, H., Tripati, S., Walker Vadillo, V., Fahy, B., and Kimura, J. (eds.)]]></dcterms:creator>
    <dcterms:date><![CDATA[5/20/2014]]></dcterms:date>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.themua.org/collections/items/show/1656">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Protecting the Underwater Cultural Heritage<br />
in the waters surrounding Hong Kong]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Since its colonial founding in 1841 Hong Kong has been a vibrant centre for international trade and commerce. Its strategic location at the head of the Pearl River made it a perfect location for maritime trade. Before this the waters surrounding Hong Kongâ€™s 200 plus islands were the notorious hideouts of pirates seeking to plunder the rich merchant vessels trading between China and its South East Asian neighbours. The waters around Hong Kong are only now being fully explored for their cultural heritage. Professionals and amateurs are seeking the resting places of infamous pirate wrecks and the wrecks of their victims. Harbor developments and sea fortifications are being examined. However, the continued expansion of Hong Kong as a trading centre and the shortage of land for development places many underwater areas that may have significant heritage information at risk. Developments and land reclamation in the world famous Victoria Harbor have raised concerns locally and internationally. The building and expansion of the Chek Lap Kok Airport and the building of the Hong Kong-Macau-Zhuhai Bridge have given archaeologists opportunity to discover evidence of Hong Kongâ€™s underwater cultural heritage but have also raised concerns regarding its damage and destruction. This paper considers the protection Hong Kongâ€™s laws provide for the underwater cultural heritage in the face of threats from building projects, reclamation, increased traffic in established sea routes and the establishment of new commercial sea routes.]]></dcterms:description>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[Steven Gallagher, in Van Tilburg, H., Tripati, S., Walker Vadillo, V., Fahy, B., and Kimura, J. (eds.)]]></dcterms:creator>
    <dcterms:date><![CDATA[5/20/2014]]></dcterms:date>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.themua.org/collections/items/show/1655">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[A Model Law to Implement the Convention on the Protection of the Underwater Cultural Heritage and its Possible Application in Plural Legal Regimes in Pacific Small Islands States: A Case study of Solomon Islands]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[A strategy for promoting the adoption of the Convention on the Protection of the Underwater Cultural Heritage, is the adoption of a Model Law; one that also promotes uniformity, consistency and ease of use. This, however, is a challenge in the Pacific. Solomon Islands, for example, like most Pacific island nations, has a plural legal regime. That is, customary law operates in conjunction with the common law, a legacy of Solomon Islandsâ€™ colonial past. Legal pluralism raises significant difficulties for the protection and management of cultural heritage, and is especially challenging when the maritime areas beyond the low water mark are involved. This paper considers the barriers to protection of underwater cultural heritage raised by legal pluralism and the further difficulties encountered when considering Solomon Islandâ€™s possible ratification on the 2001 Convention on the Protection of the Underwater Cultural Heritage. It considers whether a Model Law might be a useful tool in this endeavour.]]></dcterms:description>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[Craig Forrest]]></dcterms:creator>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[Jennifer Corrin, in Van Tilburg, H., Tripati, S., Walker Vadillo, V., Fahy, B., and Kimura, J. (eds.)]]></dcterms:creator>
    <dcterms:date><![CDATA[5/20/2014]]></dcterms:date>
</rdf:Description></rdf:RDF>
