<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/">
<rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.themua.org/collections/items/show/1243">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Shipâ€™s Cargo beyond the sea: <br />
New Evidence from Dong Mae Nang Muang, <br />
Nakorn Sawan Province, Central Thailand]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:subject><![CDATA[Session 4<br />
The archaeological study of shipsâ€™ cargo, hull, and maritime infrastructure]]></dcterms:subject>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[This paper mainly focuses on Trade Ceramics and other cargo found from the Dvaravati settlement in Upper Chao Phraya basin, Central Thailand. Specifically, this paper focuses on the case study of the site of Dong Mae Nang Muang, Nakorn Sawan province.<br />
<br />
In 2008 an archaeological project was done to gain better knowledge of the site. Four test pits, one test trench and an earthen mound were excavated. These activities expanded the current understanding of the site&#039;s characteristics. The excavation revealed imported goods from all over the world such as; ceramics, glass and semi-precious stone beads and glass vessels. This important phenomenon was a strong impact on current knowledge of the inter-relationship between Dvaravati, an ancient settlement in the Upper Chao Phraya basin, and the sea port town via China and Western Asia2, this has reconsidered the role of economics in the area especially the details of trade-routes and the merchandise during the Dvaravati period (5th-12th centuries AD).]]></dcterms:description>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[Pimchanok Pongkasetkan]]></dcterms:creator>
    <dcterms:date><![CDATA[November 2011]]></dcterms:date>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.themua.org/collections/items/show/1242">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Protecting an Underwater Cultural Heritage through Visual Communication Skill]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:subject><![CDATA[Session 5<br />
UCH in the Makingâ€¦ online session]]></dcterms:subject>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[The famous quotation, â€•A picture speaks a thousand wordsâ€– illustrates how effective visual communication is in delivering messages. If properly managed, visual communication tools may persuade public perception and inform audience opinion. In Indonesia, underwater heritage sites have limited range of visualization, so it is not a surprise that these sites are enjoyed by limited communities. In managing heritage, the involvement of the community and multiple stakeholders from different backgrounds are needed to enhance better management. This paper presents how to design a concept of visual communication such as video and still photography which can bridge the limited access between community and their heritage in order to build an understanding of the underwater cultural heritage protection and its historical value.]]></dcterms:description>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[Cipto Aji Gunawan]]></dcterms:creator>
    <dcterms:date><![CDATA[November 2011]]></dcterms:date>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.themua.org/collections/items/show/1241">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Archaeological, Literary and Ethnographic Evidence for Traditional Boat-building in Kerala, South India]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:subject><![CDATA[Session 2<br />
Nautical (Ship and boat) Archaeology of South Asia]]></dcterms:subject>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Kerala possesses rich maritime traditions dating back to the Early Historic period. A few types of traditional watercrafts developed indigenously and some are influenced by external contacts. Archaeological excavations revealed a medieval sailboat at Kadakkarappally in 2003 and an Early Historic canoe at Pattanam in 2007. The Early Historic Sangam Tamil texts refer to the watercrafts of Kerala. Traditional boat-building still survives in Kerala. This paper presents the evidence for traditional boats in Kerala, their historical context and the possible external influences, until the 15th century Common Era  (CE).]]></dcterms:description>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[Veerasamy Selvakumar]]></dcterms:creator>
    <dcterms:date><![CDATA[November 2011]]></dcterms:date>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.themua.org/collections/items/show/1240">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[A National Cultural Treasure Revisited â€“ Re-assessing the â€˜Balangayâ€™ Boat Discoveries]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:subject><![CDATA[Session 4<br />
The archaeological study of shipsâ€™ cargo, hull, and maritime infrastructure]]></dcterms:subject>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[The discovery of the balangay boats in the Butuan area of Northern Mindanao was arguably the most important find in pre-colonial maritime archaeology throughout island South East Asia. This class of vessel was well known from the accounts of early Spanish visitors to the Philippines, such as the Pigafetta journal of Magellanâ€™s voyage, but no extent examples had been located until the 1970s. As a by-product of an organised excavation of a settlement at the mouth of the Agusan River, a wave of illegal pot-hunting began in the Butuan area. As these ships had no commercial value they were reported to the National Museum. A total of 11 vessels were reported as discovered between 1976 and 1998, under some 2 metres of silt. In recent years a replica of a balangay boat has been built in the Philippines and it carried out a number of trial voyages in South East Asia. This replica is due to be put on show for the public in Manila.<br />
<br />
The first vessel discovered was conserved and is exhibited on site. A second ship was excavated and is on display in Manila in a partially reconstructed form. A third vessel and portions of a fourth have been excavated and are stored in pieces on site. The National Museum is planning to reopen the site in order to record in detail the remaining ships, to trace the stylistic developments of these vessels, and to test the dating evidence. The earlier excavations indicated a range of dates covering the millennium before the Spanish colonisation. This paper is a description of the plans for the re-excavation of this prominent site. The location is very sensitive as vessels were declared â€˜National Cultural Treasuresâ€™ by Presidential Decree in 1986.<br />
]]></dcterms:description>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[Roderick Stead]]></dcterms:creator>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[E Dizon]]></dcterms:creator>
    <dcterms:date><![CDATA[November 2011]]></dcterms:date>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.themua.org/collections/items/show/1239">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Tanzania&#039;s Maritime and Underwater Cultural Heritage Assets: Strategies Towards Sustainable<br />
Conservation and Management]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:subject><![CDATA[Session 6<br />
Empowerment and relevance in maritime and underwater cultural heritage programs in developing countries]]></dcterms:subject>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Tanzania has a long and unique maritime history. This shared history left various signatures which are needed by present and future generations for their cultural, scientific and economic significance. However, despite such maritime potentiality, very miniature has been done by scholars to research, identify, document and assess the cultural significance of the Tanzanian maritime and underwater cultural heritages. It was until rescently that the country has started some initiatives to identify and manage her maritime and underwater heritage assets. This is done by the established Maritime and Underwater Cultural Heritage (MUCH) program which officially started in february 2009. Among others, the program initiatives has resulted to documenting some of the countryâ€Ÿs maritime and underwater cultural heritage assets as well as establishing a strong team from various Governmentâ€Ÿs departments and institutions.]]></dcterms:description>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[Ichumbaki, E.B]]></dcterms:creator>
    <dcterms:date><![CDATA[November 2011]]></dcterms:date>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.themua.org/collections/items/show/1238">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[The Flinders University Intensive Program in Underwater Cultural Heritage Management (FUIP-UCHM)]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:subject><![CDATA[Session 6<br />
Empowerment and relevance in maritime and underwater cultural heritage programs in developing countries]]></dcterms:subject>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[This paper examines the impact of the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) 2001 Convention on the Protection of Underwater Cultural Heritage (2001 Convention) on leadership in maritime archaeology in the Asia-Pacific region. This paper describes one model for the implementation of Article 21 (Training in Underwater Archaeology) of the Convention 2001, which involves teaching and training of maritime archaeologists in the Asia-Pacific region. The model involves the AusAID funded Australian Leadership Awards (ALA) â€“ Fellowships Flinders University Intensive Program in Underwater Cultural Heritage Management (UCHM). <br />
<br />
The Maritime Archaeology Program at Flinders University was awarded funding from AusAID, the Australian federal governmentâ€™s overseas aid organization, to bring 11 mid-career professionals involved in maritime archaeology from the Asia-Pacific region to Australia for a 6 week training program in early 2009. Mid-career professional training fits squarely into the philosophy of flexibility that underpins the teaching of maritime archaeology at Flinders University, as well as going some way to fulfilling social justice and equity aspirations. It is hoped that this model can be adopted and adapted by other countries and organizations in the Asia-Pacific region as the basis for effective collaboration and co-operation in the training and teaching of underwater archaeologists.<br />
]]></dcterms:description>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[Mark Staniforth]]></dcterms:creator>
    <dcterms:date><![CDATA[November 2011]]></dcterms:date>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.themua.org/collections/items/show/1237">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[The â€œStone Four Legged Quernâ€ (Bench) recovered in the oldest Maritime Archaeological Site at Godawaya (Ambalantota) in Sri Lanka]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:subject><![CDATA[Session 2<br />
Nautical (Ship and boat) Archaeology of South Asia]]></dcterms:subject>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[The stone bench that was recovered at the oldest Maritime Archaeological site at Godawaya (Ambalantota) in Sri Lanka is an unusual archaeological artifact which has become instrumental in turning the history of Maritime Archaeology in Sri Lanka in a new direction It has been recovered for the first time in the area of Godawaya (Ambalantota) in the Hambantota District in Sri Lanka. The particular object is a Stone Bench with four legs where the whole thing is carved out of a single stone. The main purpose of this article is to describe this stone bench and to discuss the symbols it carries with its making. Also an attempt will be made to look into the site where the object was found and other certain related aspects as well. <br />
<br />
In August 2008, Maritime Archaeologists attached to the Department of Archaeology and Central Cultural Fund (CCF) under the aegis of UNESCO launched an exploration in the area where this stone bench had been found. The location was around 30 meters under the sea at a place 4 km away from the fishery harbor in the coastal area of Godawaya village in the proximity of Ambalantota Town in the Hambantota District in Southern Province of Sri Lanka.]]></dcterms:description>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[Sanath Karunarathna]]></dcterms:creator>
    <dcterms:date><![CDATA[November 2011]]></dcterms:date>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.themua.org/collections/items/show/1236">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[The Importance of Empowering Local Community in Preserving Underwater Cultural Heritage in Indonesia:<br />
Case Study in Tulamben, Bali and in Taka Kappala, Selayar-South Sulawesi]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:subject><![CDATA[Session 6<br />
Empowerment and relevance in maritime and underwater cultural heritage programs in developing countries]]></dcterms:subject>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Indonesia has a great potential for underwater cultural heritage (UCH) but the challenge to its preservation management is also very high. Coordination among stakeholders is very important. The effort to use UCH must be aligned with the effort to preserve so that it can be sustainable for the next generations. Some problems that we are facing, namely: no optimal management; lack of awareness of people; lack of science and technology application; and no proper law enforcement. With the rapid advancement of marine technology, UCH has become increasingly easy to reach by treasures hunters such as salvage companies and local community. Many UCH in Indonesia became the victim of massive looting such as that undertaken by the local community in Taka Kappala Waters, Selayar Regency South Sulawesi Province. Marine archaeological researches in 2008 and 2009 showed the shipwreck was in a badly damaged condition due to the looting activity that has lasted almost two years. The people did not realize that the use of UCH if well-managed will improve living standards for people in the vicinity of the site. Unlike theft cases in Selayar, in Bali the local community gives high appreciation to the existence of a shipwreck site in their area. They realized that shipwrecks are one of the potential marine resources which can be exploited for marine tourism. Liberty wreck in Tulamben, Bali has become a world-class tourist destination for divers. The local people have been protecting it with the customary law they made and obeyed, i.e. with a restriction on fishing activity around the shipwreck site. So then this site is very well maintained and became a central area for growth of marine life. Liberty wreck location is an example of a very beautiful blend and harmony among the remains of ancient human objects, very rich marine life, and a very high local community appreciation.]]></dcterms:description>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[Nia Naelul Hasanah Ridwan]]></dcterms:creator>
    <dcterms:date><![CDATA[November 2011]]></dcterms:date>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.themua.org/collections/items/show/1235">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Maritime archaeology in New Zealand: trials, tribulations and opportunities]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:subject><![CDATA[Session 8<br />
Pacific Islands region: Building UCH Capacity]]></dcterms:subject>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[New Zealand is an island nation that was initially settled via the sea firstly by Polynesian voyagers and later by a European maritime culture. These two groups traded and traversed in and along the coastline leaving considerable physical evidence of their seafaring ways. Today this maritime past is reflected in more than 2000 shipwrecks as well as numerous canoe landing sites, fish traps, inundated villages and sunken canoes.<br />
<br />
Despite this wealth of underwater cultural heritage (UCH) and a strong legislative base for the protection of archaeological sites, maritime archaeology in New Zealand is significantly underdeveloped with no effective program for the management or protection of UCH. As a consequence the public of New Zealand rarely views shipwrecks and other UCH as sites that need to be protected. This lack of perceived value results in limited funding being available for the investigation or management of maritime archaeological sites and as such developmental pressures, commercial salvage and fossicking continue to damage this non-renewable resource.<br />
<br />
Although these are major challenges there are still considerable opportunities for underwater archaeology in New Zealand. Increased awareness of underwater cultural heritage can be achieved by engaging the public in various ways such as through Australian Institute of Maritime Archaeology/Nautical Archaeology Society (AIMA/NAS) training courses. In addition, the global nature of New Zealandâ€™s maritime trade means that there is enormous scope for international collaboration between researchers at a diverse range of organisations around the world. Such actions would help provide the impetus for capacity building and the eventual establishment of an effective maritime archaeology program in New Zealand.<br />
]]></dcterms:description>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[Matthew Carter]]></dcterms:creator>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[Andy Dodd]]></dcterms:creator>
    <dcterms:date><![CDATA[November 2011]]></dcterms:date>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.themua.org/collections/items/show/1234">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Shipwreck Site and Earthenware Vessels in the Philippines:<br />
Earthenware vessels of the Pandanan Shipwreck Site]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:subject><![CDATA[Session 4<br />
The archaeological study of shipsâ€™ cargo, hull, and maritime infrastructure]]></dcterms:subject>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Eighteen shipwreck sites had been identified and researched in the Philippines by 2003 (Dizon 2003).  The main goods of the cargos of these ships were porcelain wares and stoneware jars which had been produced in kiln sites in China and Mainland Southeast Asia such as Vietnam, Thailand and Myanmar (Alba 1993; Crick 1996; Diem 1996; Desroches 1996; Salcedo 1993; Valdes 1993). Many scholars have been interested in these porcelain wares and stoneware jars.<br />
<br />
Beside these porcelain wares and stoneware jars, earthenware vessels were also found in the shipwreck sites. However, only a few scholars have paid attention to earthenware vessels found in shipwreck sites. One of whom is Amalia de la Torre (1993; 1996), she conducted the study of earthenware vessels found in the San Diego Shipwreck Site. Earthenware vessels found in the shipwreck sites are often not goods for trading or bartering but for daily utensils of the people on a voyage (de la Torre 1993; 1996).<br />
<br />
The Pandanan Shipwreck Site is one of the rare shipwreck sites dated around the middle of the 15th century, its rarity is presumably because the Chinese imperial court totally banned private trading during this period (Sakuma 1989). Allison Diem (1996) has already conducted the study of glazed ceramics such as porcelain wares and stoneware jars found in the site and identified as wares produced in kiln sites in central Vietnam (Binh Dinh Province). However, she did not conduct the study of the unglazed earthenware vessels. Consequently there is no significant documentation of the earthenware vessels excavated in the Pandanan Shipwreck Site <br />
<br />
The writer believes that earthenware vessels of the shipwreck sites are also very important artifacts which sometimes indicate daily lives of the people on board and the possible route of the ship and the trade, even though they are easily neglected. In this article, the writer will point out the similarity of the forms of globular pots with a spout excavated in the Pandanan Wreck Site, the Lena Shoal Wreck Site and the Calatagan Sites (the terrestrial sites) in Batangas Province (Tanaka 2005). On the basis of this similarity, the sailing route of the Pandanan ship will be discussed in this article.<br />
]]></dcterms:description>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[Kazuhiko Tanaka]]></dcterms:creator>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[Eusebio Z. Dizon]]></dcterms:creator>
    <dcterms:date><![CDATA[November 2011]]></dcterms:date>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.themua.org/collections/items/show/1233">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[An overview of shipwreck explorations in Goa waters]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:subject><![CDATA[Session 2<br />
Nautical (Ship and boat) Archaeology of South Asia]]></dcterms:subject>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Since the beginning of maritime archaeological research in Indian waters, marine records housed in archives of India and abroad provide details of the shipwrecks and the loss of Indian ships in foreign waters. Information on more than 200 shipwrecks in Indian waters has been gathered from archival records and attempts made to explore in Goa, Lakshadweep and Tamil Nadu waters. These shipwrecks are dated to the post 16th century AD. Shipwrecks were explored off Sunchi Reef, St Georgeâ€™s Reef and Amee Shoals in Goa waters. Sunchi Reef and St Georgeâ€™s Reef were wooden hulled sailing ships whereas Amee Shoals was a steel hulled steam engine shipwreck. Sunchi Reef exploration led to the recovery of guns, barrels of handguns, storage jars, Chinese ceramics, elephant tusks, hippopotamus teeth, iron anchors and other items that are evidence of Indo-Portuguese trade and commerce in the 17th century. Exploration off St Georgeâ€™s Reef uncovered timber and terracotta artefacts such as column capitals, drums, ridge tiles, roof and floor tiles and chimney bricks The bricks and tiles have the distinct inscription of Basel Mission Tile works 1865. Amee shoals exploration revealed the remains of a steel hulled steam engine shipwreck in which boilers, boiler bricks, and engine parts were found. The stamps on the flanges and the name on the firebricks suggest a British origin, dating from the 1880s or later. ]]></dcterms:description>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[Sila Tripati]]></dcterms:creator>
    <dcterms:date><![CDATA[November 2011]]></dcterms:date>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.themua.org/collections/items/show/1232">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Literary &amp; Archaeological Evidence of Early Seafaring &amp; Navigation Technologies in India]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:subject><![CDATA[Session 2<br />
Nautical (Ship and boat) Archaeology of South Asia]]></dcterms:subject>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[India is situated at the central point of the ocean that washes on its coast on three sides, seemed destined very early for a maritime future in the region. Both literature and archaeological works of the region are providing ample evidence about the early sea routes and maritime trade activities of the region. Vedic literature, one of the early existed texts, has provided copious references about the early seafaring. There was a time in the past when Indians were the masters of the long distance seaborne trade. They built ships, navigated the sea, and held in their hands all the threads of international commerce, whether carried overland or via sea. The archaeological excavations of several Indo-Saraswathi, the first civilization in the region, sites and many others have also conclusively demonstrated advance maritime activities right from the third millennium Before Christ  (BCE). During the early historical period (second BCE to second CE) several coastal towns, both east and west coasts of peninsular India, had international trade and commerce.  The subject matter for the present discussion are based on glimpses of the regional seafaring and navigation technologies mentioned in the available early indigenous literature of the Sanskrit language, as well as archaeological records. <br />
<br />
Key words â€“ Vedic literature, Sanskrit, Rigveda, Matsya yantra ]]></dcterms:description>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[S. Rama Krishna Pisipaty]]></dcterms:creator>
    <dcterms:date><![CDATA[November 2011]]></dcterms:date>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.themua.org/collections/items/show/1231">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Traditional island Southeast Asian watercraft in Philippine archaeological sites]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:subject><![CDATA[Session 4<br />
The archaeological study of shipsâ€™ cargo, hull, and maritime infrastructure]]></dcterms:subject>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[The seas of island South East Asia have long been an aid rather than a hindrance to movements within the region and among close neighbours. Many shared cultural traits show evidence of maritime connections within the region. As has been revealed by archaeology, historical accounts and ethnography, a boatbuilding tradition likewise emerged out of island Southeast Asia. At least three examples of such watercraft have been identified in Philippine archaeological sites, all of which predate Spanish colonization. While the remains of these sites were documented and recorded, little comprehensive research has so far been done from these sites to form a cohesive study on the ancient maritime culture in the Philippines and interactions with its Southeast Asian neighbours. This paper seeks to present the known examples of Southeast Asian boats in the archaeological record, ethnographic and regional parallels, and discuss the potential of future inquiries into revealing more of the Philippinesâ€™ maritime past.]]></dcterms:description>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[Ligaya S.P.  Lacsina]]></dcterms:creator>
    <dcterms:date><![CDATA[November 2011]]></dcterms:date>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.themua.org/collections/items/show/1230">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[The Belitung Wreck Site After Commercial Salvage In 1998<br />
]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[The Belitung Shipwreck Site, located at 17 meters (m) depth in Belitung waters, Indonesia, is a shipwreck site containing Tang Dynasty (AD 618-906) cargo that was lifted by private salvage companies, Limited Corporation/Perusahaan Terbatas (PT). Sulung Segara Jaya and Seabed Exploration Company in 1998. The salvaging  process was done without involving Indonesian State archaeologists. The shipwreck is an Arab or Indian vessel that includes 60,000  artifacts from the Tang Dynasty. In 2005, the artifacts sold to  Singapore Sentosa Leisure Group. <br />
<br />
In 2010, the Office for Cultural Heritage Preservation of Jambi conducted the first underwater archaeological survey at Belitung Shipwreck site in order to find out the  conditions of the site after the salvaging operation. The result shows that the site is extremely ravaged, with unidentified ceramic fragments spread out in a radius of Â± 20 square meters (mÂ²). It seems clear that the ceramic fragments have been removed by the company then thrown back into the sea because considered non-commercial. Meanwhile, the structure of the actual shipwreck was not found. It was only a big  hole with 6 m wide and 15 m long, which seems to be where the ship may have settled. The remnants are now just a few small wood fragments and a sizable chunk of wood,  this maybe the mast-step. The Belitung Shipwreck is recognized worldwide as an extremely valuable find in Indonesian waters. Preservation efforts are needed to remind future generations that the shipwreck site very important for underwater archaeology in Indonesia. Some preservation efforts that can be done are legal protection, site rehabilitation, and establishing a maritime museum in Belitung Regency. The last of which efforts have initiated two years ago with the aim to preserve artifacts from Belitung shipwreck site and other underwater sites in Bangka Belitung Province.<br />
]]></dcterms:description>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[Agus Sudaryadi]]></dcterms:creator>
    <dcterms:date><![CDATA[November 2011]]></dcterms:date>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.themua.org/collections/items/show/1229">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Shared Heritage? Shared Responsibility? Reflections on the role of â€˜sharedâ€™ colonial heritage within capacity building programs in the postcolonial world]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:subject><![CDATA[Session 6<br />
Empowerment and relevance in maritime and underwater cultural heritage programs in developing countries]]></dcterms:subject>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[The Centre for International Heritage Activities (CIE) has been involved in developing Maritime and Underwater Cultural Heritage Programs (MUCH) in Asia and Africa since the 1990s. Although these programs aimed for a general development of capacity and awareness for MUCH in the specific region, often the focal point of the program was international (colonial) heritage sites. Although understandable from the practical implication of funding opportunities and available expertise of the international trainers, our experiences showed that this focus was not ideal for the establishment of a sustainable policy on MUCH management in the post colonial countries.<br />
<br />
Building on that experience CIE has developed a vision on international cooperation that places MUCH in a broader perspective by including a platform of local and international stakeholders in all stages of the program. Through discussions about the relevance of the MUCH sites for the various stakeholders awareness can be raised for each otherâ€™s perspective on this type of heritage. Since the United Nations Education, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) 2001 Convention on the Protection of Underwater Cultural Heritage (2001 Convention) explicitly promotes international cooperation and given the reality that many MUCH sites in Asia and Africa are linked with the past of European expansion, it is important to develop a vision on the role of this colonial heritage that is seen by some as â€˜shared heritageâ€™ within the national, regional and global context.<br />
<br />
This paper evaluates the MUCH programs of the CIE in Asia and Africa and hopes with this to open the discussion on best practices in establishing a sustainable MUCH program on a local/regional level but promotes at the same time international cooperation to be inclusive for all types of MUCH.]]></dcterms:description>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[Dr. Robert Parthesius]]></dcterms:creator>
    <dcterms:date><![CDATA[November 2011]]></dcterms:date>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.themua.org/collections/items/show/1228">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Investigation of Abandoned WW II Wrecks in Palau]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:subject><![CDATA[Session 1<br />
Contexts of War and Conflict in Maritime and Underwater Cultural Heritage Research and Management]]></dcterms:subject>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Over forty Japanese vessels were sunken in the water of Palau during WWII. Some wrecks sunk in the shallow water at a depth of 20 meters or less and were salvaged. Other wrecks at 30 meters depth or more still remain and are legally protected by the authority of Palau Government but are seriously threatened by illegal treasure hunters. Initial efforts to identify human remains of Japanese soldiers were made in 2005. As part of an archaeology advisory team for the Japanese Government I carried out underwater surveys of sunken WWII vessels in Palau. In 2010 and 2011, I conducted investigations of the WWII vessels again, together with on-shore research on sites and features associated with the Japanese occupation period, funded by the Takanashi Foundation for Arts and Archaeology (Japan).<br />
<br />
The research revealed that the most of the vessels sunken in Palau were not genuine military vessels of Japanese Imperial Navy or Army but converted vessels originally built for non-combat purposes. These vessels were slow in speed and not well-equipped for combat activity. Most of them were destroyed by American aerial bombing on March 30th 1944. The evening before (March 29th) the main force of the Japanese Combined Fleet, including its flagship Musashi, retreated from Palau. It is clear that the vessels left in Palau were abandoned as a â€œthird wheelâ€ of the Combined Fleet. These abandoned-converted vessels include cargo carriers, tankers, whaling boats and fishing boats. This implies that Japanese troops were experiencing a difficult and desperate campaign at that time.]]></dcterms:description>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[Tomo Ishimura]]></dcterms:creator>
    <dcterms:date><![CDATA[November 2011]]></dcterms:date>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.themua.org/collections/items/show/1227">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Human Resources Development in Indonesia&#039;s Underwater Archaeology]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:subject><![CDATA[Session 6<br />
Empowerment and relevance in maritime and underwater cultural heritage programs in developing countries]]></dcterms:subject>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[The Indonesian archipelago position is located in a very strategic position at the crossroads of world maritime trade between the Pacific and Indian Oceans. According to archaeological and historical research, there is evidence that Indonesia has had a maritime nautical culture since prehistoric times. Some evidence of Indonesian maritime cultural civilization can still be found scattered on the ocean floor, including approximately 463 ancient ship location points according to data from the Ministry of Maritime Affairs and Fisheries.<br />
<br />
The Ministry of Culture and Tourism, which is the Indonesian government agency that handles the field of culture, now has approximately 80 staff divers. Only a fraction of that number have competence in the field of underwater archaeology, so it is necessary to improve the knowledge and skills, not only in the field of diving but also the ability to conduct surveys, mapping, data recording excavation, and conservation. In the last five years, efforts to increase human resources in underwater archaeology in Indonesia continue to be done through various education and training, whether conducted in Indonesia or abroad facilitated by the United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), such as in Thailand, Sri Lanka, and the Philippines. The effort is certainly not optimal and systematic, so it is necessary to develop appropriate strategies both in quantity and quality. Indonesia needs an underwater archaeological development centre that will prepare a teaching module, instructor, certification and partnerships (networking), as well as supporting facilities and infrastructure. Through this institution we can expect human resources of underwater archaeologists to have the following abilities: (1) diving, (2) various regulations relating to underwater cultural heritage, (3) development of management plans, and recording and documenting sites, (4) procedures, methods, principles and ethics of underwater archaeology, (5) artifact conservation and storage, (6) traditional knowledge, and (7) publications and exhibitions. In the last five years we have implemented several training programs to further underwater archaeology in Indonesia where participants have acquired skills in diving, survey and conservation. More skills would greatly empower Indonesians in managing their underwater cultural heritage, particularly at an advanced underwater archaeology theory and practice level.<br />
]]></dcterms:description>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[Judi Wahjudin]]></dcterms:creator>
    <dcterms:date><![CDATA[November 2011]]></dcterms:date>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.themua.org/collections/items/show/1226">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[An Advocacy Approach on Underwater Heritage in Indonesia, Case Study: An auction on underwater heritage from Cirebon waters in 2010]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:subject><![CDATA[Session 6<br />
Empowerment and relevance in maritime and underwater cultural heritage programs in developing countries]]></dcterms:subject>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Despite the countryâ€™s assertion about its ancient, international history and its diverse culture, there are many cases in Indonesia where some cultural heritage objects are under the threat of ignorance of both the people and the government. Various sites and/or artifacts are damaged or lost due to infrastructure development, or being looted to be sold to some collectors or goes out to some auction houses abroad. A Bill was issued in 1992 to manage this situation, and recently (2011) another bill was issued to put a more severe punishment and to put a more relevant context toward this matter, but so far these seem to be ineffective. No one was ever punished for any crimes regarding this matter. Based on experience mentioned above, an advocacy for the law deemed necessary to preserve and protect the nationâ€™s cultural heritage, including its underwater cultural heritage. <br />
<br />
In 2010 treasures were surfaced from a shipwreck on Cirebon waters. The treasure went to an international auction, committed by the government of Indonesia, and actively monitored by the media, activists, and the community in general. The government supported looting and auction could start a through advocacy for preserving and protecting underwater cultural heritage. Some clues include: prohibition for local fishermen to come near the area, permissions improperly issued for international divers around the shipwreck, a Presidential Decree issued against a higher law (Act No. 5 Year 1992 on Cultural Heritage), and the auction itself which disrespects the artifacts status as a cultural heritage. <br />
<br />
This experience can become a precedent for advocating a better policy and enforcement toward preserving and protecting underwater cultural heritage, particularly in Indonesia.<br />
]]></dcterms:description>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[Jhohannes Marbun]]></dcterms:creator>
    <dcterms:date><![CDATA[November 2011]]></dcterms:date>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.themua.org/collections/items/show/1225">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[The Australian Historic Shipwreck Protection Project]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:subject><![CDATA[Session 7 <br />
Preservation and conservation of wet archaeological materials and site management]]></dcterms:subject>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Australian wooden shipwrecks represent significant submerged heritage sites with huge potential to inform on historic connections, technological innovation and early colonial behavioural systems. Their archaeological potential is unfortunately often under severe threat from natural and human impacts. The Australian Historic Shipwreck Protection Project has recently been granted a large Australian Research Council (ARC) Linkage grant to investigate the excavation, reburial and in-situ preservation of wrecks and their associated artefacts, which are at risk. This project will focus on Clarence (1850), a historically significant colonial wooden trading vessel, and brings together the disciplines of behavioural archaeology, maritime archaeology, conservation sciences and maritime object conservation. The vessel lies in Port Phillip Bay in Victoria only a few hours from Melbourne by boat and by land. The overarching theoretical focus will be on shipwreck site formation models as well as the potential of wooden historic wrecks and assemblages to elucidate early colonial history and shipbuilding. <br />
<br />
One of the main aims of the project is to try and develop a protocol for the rapid excavation, detailed recording and subsequent in-situ preservation of significant shipwrecks and their associated artefacts, at risk. This work will foster the development of a consistent national methodology for shipwreck and artefact storage and preservation underwater and assist in developing a strategy for the in-situ preservation of endangered historic shipwrecks. This work will also be critical to the future development of national, and possibly international, policy and technical guidelines for site managers of historic wrecks.<br />
<br />
The project will run for a period of three years. During the field work components the investigators from the University of Western Australia (UWA), the Australian National University (ANU), Monash University and the Western Australian Museum (WAM) with support from research associates and practitioners from the ten partner organisations will operate from a jack-up barge located over the site including purpose built laboratories where they will excavate circa 25-50% of the Clarence site, conduct imaging (x-ray and optical) of recovered artefacts, conserve at-risk materials (where required) and rebury structural elements and associated artefacts using a combination of in-situ preservation techniques and initiate a long-term monitoring programme for the site. Excavation methodology will be overseen by Mark Staniforth, Peter Harvey (Heritage Victoria) and Peter Veth; conservation and in-situ preservation protocols, analyses and pre- and post-reburial monitoring by Ian MacLeod and Vicki Richards; imaging co-ordinated by Dudley Creigh (and colleagues) and Andrew Viduka; geoarchaeology and Geographical Information systems (GIS) by Tony Barham and Masters of Archaeological Science candidates.<br />
]]></dcterms:description>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[Peter Veth ]]></dcterms:creator>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[Andrew Viduka]]></dcterms:creator>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[Mark Staniforth]]></dcterms:creator>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[Ian MacLeod]]></dcterms:creator>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[Vicki Richards]]></dcterms:creator>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[Anthony Barham]]></dcterms:creator>
    <dcterms:date><![CDATA[November 2011]]></dcterms:date>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.themua.org/collections/items/show/1220">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Ships and Navigation in the Medieval South India]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:subject><![CDATA[Session 2<br />
Nautical (Ship and boat) Archaeology of South Asia]]></dcterms:subject>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[The maritime activities of Indian sub continent have a hoary past. The inscriptions of medieval South India disclose information about the ports of Coromandel coast, the various kinds of boats and ships and goods that were imported and exported through these ports. The inscriptions of the Cholas, Pandyas and the other major dynasties in the Andhra region give valuable evidence on this aspect. Besides, the inscriptional evidences there are quite a number of sculptures, coins bearing the figure of ships and boats attest to the various kinds of vessels of that period. The Cholas who ruled over the entire Tamil country in the medieval period made sevaral voyages to the South-East Asian countries through big vessels. Rajaraja I, the great Chola king (A.D.985-1014), allowed Srivijaya king Sri Mara Vijayadunga Varman son of Sulamanivarman to build a Buddhist vihara in the name of his father Sulamanivarman at Nagappattinam, which suggests that he had a cordial relatio nship with the kingdoms of far east countries during his regime. His able son Rajendra I (A.D.1012-1044) he crossed the Bay of Bengal and reached many countries which were listed in the lengthy prasasti. His prasasti mentions that he used many kinds of ships on the ocean to reach the Southeast Asian countries such as Kadaram (modern Kedha) Java and Sumatra.<br />
<br />
An inscription from Mottuppalli refers to the various kinds of ships which were anchored on the Andhra coast. The port had a yard for ship repair. This port was declared as a tax-free zone for the ships affected during storms. An inscription from Nagalapuram near Chittor in Andhrapradesh refers to a kind of ship knows as tongukappal in Tamil. In all probability it could be a big Chinese vessel, namely the jung. This paper discusses in details the nature of the ships and navigation in medieval south India]]></dcterms:description>
    <dcterms:creator><![CDATA[S.Rajavelu]]></dcterms:creator>
    <dcterms:date><![CDATA[November 2011]]></dcterms:date>
</rdf:Description></rdf:RDF>
